oma v. puco -- aep ohio data center tariff challenge

case overview

CaseOhio Manufacturers’ Association v. PUCO
CourtOhio Supreme Court
FiledLate 2025
PartiesOMA and industrial customers v. PUCO; AEP Ohio as intervenor
StatusActive

background

oma challenges puco’s approval of a data center tariff requiring large new data center customers to pay for 85% of subscribed electricity regardless of consumption, for up to 12 years. oma argues:

  1. improper gamesmanship: aep paused data center interconnections (choking off supply), initially claiming 30,000 mw of demand (later revised to ~5,700 mw), giving aep “undue bargaining power”
  2. discrimination: singling out one industry for special rate treatment
  3. frozen projects: aep ohio imposed substantial barriers to new data center interconnections in columbus beginning 2023, pausing new service and freezing 50+ proposed projects

aep argues the tariff ensures data centers “pay their fair share” for grid infrastructure.


sources


last updated: february 22, 2026

on this page