Measuring and Modeling the U.S. Regulatory Ecosystem
datasetLarge-scale empirical analysis of regulatory complexity using 165,000+ SEC filings to map the evolution of the U.S. regulatory landscape
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
A groundbreaking research project analyzing the U.S. regulatory ecosystem through computational analysis of over 165,000 corporate annual reports (Form 10-Ks) filed with the SEC between 1993-2016.
Research Overview
This project conceptualizes the regulatory environment as an βecosystemβ where companies are βorganismsβ that must adapt to regulatory changes. By analyzing over 4.5 million references to U.S. Federal Acts and Agencies, the research provides empirical evidence for regulatory complexity trends.
Publication
- Authors: Michael James Bommarito, Daniel Martin Katz
- Published: Journal of Statistical Physics (August 2017)
- Paper: Available on arXiv and SSRN
Methodology
Data Collection
- Source: SEC EDGAR database via LexPredict
- Scope: 34,000+ companies, 165,000+ Form 10-K filings
- Timeline: 23 years (1993-2016)
- Extracted: 4.5+ million regulatory references
Analysis Framework
- βRegulatory bitstringβ encoding for each company-year
- Network analysis of regulatory similarities
- Dimensionality and diversity measurements
- Temporal evolution tracking
Key Findings
Increasing Regulatory βTemperatureβ
- Rise in regulatory energy per filing
- Growing complexity over time
Growing Ecosystem Diversity
- Expanding dimensionality of regulatory space
- Increasing distance between companiesβ regulatory profiles
Sector-Specific Patterns
- Identification of regulatory βmicroclimatesβ
- Industry-specific adaptation patterns
Technical Implementation
The project employs:
- Natural Language Processing for reference extraction
- Network visualization of regulatory relationships
- Statistical modeling of ecosystem dynamics
- Jupyter notebooks for reproducible analysis
Impact
This research:
- Provides first large-scale empirical evidence for regulatory complexity claims
- Establishes framework for measuring regulatory burden
- Enables data-driven policy discussions
- Demonstrates computational approaches to legal analysis
Broader Significance
βWhile individuals across the political, economic, and academic world frequently refer to trends in this regulatory ecosystem, far less attention has been paid to supporting such claims with large-scale, longitudinal data.β This project fills that gap with rigorous empirical analysis.